SEO GEO Checker audits SEO, GEO, and AI visibility
SEO GEO Checker is the free webpage audit tool from SEO GEO Now. Enter a public URL without sharing website admin, server, or database access to review technical SEO, Generative Engine Optimization, structured data, answer readability, and AI visibility. Basic webpage audits are free; whole-site scans use site scan credits.
What you enter and what you receive
| Stage | Details |
|---|---|
| Input | One public HTTP or HTTPS webpage URL |
| Read | Target HTML plus required public robots.txt, sitemap.xml, and available performance data |
| Analyze | Technical SEO, semantics, structured data, GEO, extractable answers, and trust cues |
| Output | Dimension scores, item status, page evidence, risk, fixes, and related guides |
| Re-check | Submit the URL after deployment to confirm the returned HTML contains the fix |
What the audit checks
Displayed checks are weighted for the page type and available evidence instead of using a fixed count that hides page differences. Findings link to verifiable HTML evidence and repair guidance.
| Dimension | Checks |
|---|---|
| Technical SEO | Title, meta, H1, headings, canonical, robots, sitemap, status, viewport, language, HTTPS |
| Structured data | JSON-LD type, syntax, page fit, FAQ, breadcrumb, organization, article, and related entities |
| GEO and answers | Direct answers, question headings, summaries, lists, tables, definitions, and steps |
| Entities and trust | Brand and product naming, author, dates, sources, citations, contact details, freshness |
| Sharing and locale | Open Graph, Twitter Cards, hreflang, language, and localization signals |
| Performance support | PageSpeed data when available without treating third-party API failure as page failure |
Single-page audits versus whole-site scans
A single-page audit deeply reviews one URL. A whole-site scan starts from the project homepage, robots.txt, and sitemap.xml, then summarizes shared issues and historical changes across same-domain HTML pages within the configured limit.
| Capability | Single page | Whole site |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Improve a homepage, landing page, service page, or article | Migration inventory, launch regression, recurring site health |
| Depth | Item evidence, scores, fixes, and guides | Duplicate titles/descriptions, errors, orphans, canonical conflicts, and trends |
| Scope | One submitted public URL | 25 pages by default, with a configurable higher limit |
| Credit | One audit credit per successful audit | One audit credit per manual or scheduled scan |
| Failure | Credit refunded when no valid report is produced | Credit refunded when the scan fails |
How scoring and priorities work
The report does not derive a mystery score from keyword density. It evaluates verifiable signals and weights technical foundations, page type, content structure, and likely impact. Use the score to compare the same page before and after a repair, not to compare unrelated industries and page types.
- Collect evidence
Record response, HTML, metadata, body structure, JSON-LD, robots, and sitemap signals.
- Identify page context
Select a relevant check mix so an article is not judged as if it were a product page.
- Assess status and impact
Mark pass, warning, or failure and explain whether it affects access, meaning, presentation, or trust.
- Prioritize repair
Fix blocking and global foundations before semantics, answer structure, schema, and enhancements.
How a sample finding supports implementation
| Field | Example | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Issue | FAQPage missing | Names the detected gap |
| Evidence | Six question headings are visible but no FAQPage JSON-LD exists | Makes the finding reproducible in source |
| Risk | Machines may not identify the standard Q&A relationship | Explains why the issue matters |
| Fix | Add FAQPage JSON-LD matching the visible questions and answers | Provides an actionable, bounded change |
| Validation | Re-audit and confirm the JSON-LD appears in returned HTML | Confirms the fix reached production |
Access and data boundaries
- Only public pages without login, CAPTCHA, or intranet access can be analyzed.
- No website admin, hosting, database, or webmaster account access is requested.
- Timeouts, bot protection, firewalls, SSL, redirects, and non-HTML responses can cause failure.
- Audit results and structured summaries are saved for history, re-checks, and plans.
- Scores and recommendations do not guarantee search ranking, indexing, AI citation, or recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does it crawl the whole site?
Yes. Single-page audits deeply review one URL, while projects can scan same-domain HTML from the homepage, robots.txt, and sitemap.xml, analyzing up to 25 pages by default and saving historical snapshots.
Do failed audits consume credits?
No. If the target page cannot be accessed or analyzed, the credit is returned through the failure flow.
Does it need website admin access?
No. It reads only the public URL and required public robots.txt or sitemap.xml resources.
Does the score guarantee ranking or AI citations?
No. It identifies verifiable page issues and supports before-and-after comparison; competition, brand, links, content value, and platform algorithms still affect visibility.
Sources and further reading
Continue with a related guide
Next Step
Audit a real page, fix the highest-priority issues, then re-check the URL after implementation.